Dear World 2 - Dear World

29 October, 2025

AI: Scalpel or Dagger?

AI is potentially the sharpest instrument humanity has ever built. In steady hands, it’s a scalpel: precise, careful, lifesaving. In careless hands, it’s a deadly weapon.

The question isn’t whether AI will reshape our world – it already is. The question is whether we’re wielding it wisely.

Used correctly, it could be humanity’s greatest triumph – solving climate change, eliminating famine, extending healthy human lifespan, and freeing us to pursue our highest potential. By taking this path, we could create a world where children never die of preventable disease, where humans never struggle with basic needs, where we finally have the tools to address every major challenge facing our species.

Instead, we’re wielding this incredible power to generate horoscopes and summarize TikTok videos. AI with the potential to cure cancer is writing LinkedIn posts. Systems capable of designing life-saving drugs are crafting pickup lines for dating apps. We’re training trillion-dollar models to write breakup texts, generate fake Yelp reviews, and create Instagram captions about avocado toast.

We’re heading rapidly toward the extinction of human intelligence – and maybe humanity itself.

Yesterday’s Army, Today’s Teenager

Remember Cambridge Analytica? In 2016, they needed a team of researchers to scrape people’s private information for data-driven targeting purposes.

Today, a teenager can do the same thing from their bedroom with free AI tools.

Stanford and Georgetown studies from 2024 confirm that “language models can generate text that is nearly as persuasive for US audiences as content…sourced from real-world foreign covert propaganda campaigns.” The Bulletin reports a surge in AI-driven disinformation in 2025, citing NewsGuard’s finding of 1,200+ AI-generated ‘news’ sites that have been “churning out false claims and operating with little to no human oversight.”

The infrastructure for mass manipulation is no longer expensive or exclusive. It’s democratized. And we’re handing it to anyone with an internet connection, while making ourselves more vulnerable to its influence.

Remember our first letter? Every time you use AI to do your thinking, you get worse at thinking.

Students worldwide are using AI to write their essays, then wondering why they can’t articulate original ideas. Professionals are using AI to draft every email, then finding they’ve lost the ability to communicate nuance. Developers are using AI to write every function, then discovering they can’t debug when something breaks.

We’re training ourselves to be helpless.

We’re Giving AI Access to the Most Intimate Parts of Our Lives

Parents and teachers are usually hyper-vigilant about keeping potentially dangerous influences away from children. However, they’re now the ones allowing AI to take over for them, and they’re actively encouraging kids to become dependent on it.

According to Rest of World, AI tools are flooding classrooms and households alike in China. Children are spending hours learning from and communicating with AI instead of their caregivers, to the point where “they prefer talking to AI.” Parents are describing AI tools as “part of the family,” and Futurism recently reported on a little girl who wept in devastation when her AI companion broke.

Rest of World also reports on educators and researchers warning that allowing children to become overreliant on AI tools “may cause harm by limiting children’s social interactions and weakening their learning skills.”

We’re no longer looking at hypothetical, sci-fi scenarios. AI dependence is now a part of real life, and we’re nurturing it from the ground up.

And yet, we’re still blundering forward, despite all the dangers.

The Race Nobody Wants to Lose

You’ve heard the warnings. In an episode of the Huge Conversations podcast with Cleo Abram, and as cited in this Forbes article, Sam Altman says a kid born today will never be smarter than AI. In his interviews with both Axios and Alex Kantrowitz, Dario Amodei predicted that AI could eliminate half of entry-level, white-collar jobs. And the headlines scream about human obsolescence and mass unemployment.

These fears aren’t baseless. CNBC reports that many companies are now cutting costs by laying off humans. Bloomberg also warns that we’re watching AI replace entry-level jobs – the very jobs that traditionally serve as stepping stones to senior roles.

But the economic displacement is just one piece of a much larger problem.

According to Investopedia, countries are pouring billions into AI development, and some experts predict artificial general intelligence within 5–10 years.

This has triggered a global AI race where tech giants and nation-states are increasingly intertwined. According to another article by CNBC, companies like Google and Microsoft are spending billions on AI computing power. Time Magazine reports that “the dawn of AGI will also have implications for hard geopolitical power.”

And in this mad dash to the finish line, a fundamental question is being overlooked:

“Is this for or against humanity’s best interests?”

We Can Use AI for Good

This isn’t the first time we’ve been faced with a technological revolution.

When bank ATMs were introduced, everyone predicted the end of bank tellers. Instead, banks opened more branches and tellers shifted from counting money to helping customers with complex financial decisions. The job evolved.

When spreadsheet software arrived, it didn’t eliminate accountants – it freed them from manual calculations to focus on analysis and strategy. The profession grew stronger.

The same pattern is emerging with AI. While some applications eliminate jobs, others are creating entirely new ones. Prompt engineers didn’t exist five years ago. AI ethicists are suddenly in demand. Data scientists work alongside machine learning engineers who partner with AI trainers.

More importantly, AI is reshaping existing roles in ways that make them more strategic, more creative – more human.

What Right Looks Like

We know how to use AI responsibly. Right now, we’re just choosing not to.

Because real AI partnership isn’t about convenience – it’s about capability.

A radiologist using AI to detect early-stage cancers doesn’t let the AI make diagnoses. The AI flags potential issues at superhuman speed and accuracy. The radiologist applies years of medical training, considers the patient’s full history, weighs risk factors, and makes the final call. Then spends the time saved in deeper conversation with patients, explaining diagnoses and providing the emotional support that machines never can.

Researchers using AI to model protein folding aren’t replaced by the technology. AI can simulate millions of molecular combinations faster than any human team. But humans decide which proteins to target, interpret whether results are biologically meaningful, design the experiments to validate findings, and determine how discoveries should be applied ethically.

The AI expands what’s possible. Humans decide what’s right.

This is what AI augmentation actually means: using machines to handle the tasks they excel at so humans can focus on judgment, creativity, empathy, and meaning-making.

The Final Choice: Ally or Enemy?

Right now, we’re at a crossroads. One path leads to AI that amplifies human potential. The other leads to AI that takes it away.

The difference comes down to a single question: Are we building AI to work with humans, or to erase us?

The future belongs to people who learn to collaborate with AI rather than surrender to it.

Your choice matters. The tools you choose to use, the companies you choose to support, the skills you choose to develop – these decisions shape whether AI becomes humanity’s greatest ally or its greatest threat.

The scalpel is in your hands.

For now, I remain anonymous. But in my next letter on 12/01, I’ll reveal my identity.

– Your friendly neighborhood whistleblower, A

2 October, 2025

Humanity Is Coming To An End. Read the first letter

2 October, 2025

Humanity Is Coming To An End.

And I can’t stay silent any longer.

Over the coming weeks, I’m going to demonstrate, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that we are marching mindlessly towards the end of humanity. And it’s not accidental, either – I’ll reveal what’s happening behind closed doors, name names, and share receipts.

This should horrify you, but it probably won’t. And that makes you complicit in your own extinction.

Wake up.

50% Unemployed. 100% Destabilized.

In an interview with Axios, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warned that AI could wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs in the next one to five years.

Not just replaced – eliminated entirely. Gone.

But this isn’t just about lost salaries. This is about entire populations losing their income, their identity, and their purpose. When half the population has no work, no income, and no purpose, what do you think happens next?

History tells us very clearly.

Since America’s Rust Belt factories closed, unemployment rates increased (male joblessness has risen to 35% in Flint), and the opioid crisis spread as communities struggled with economic decline and hopelessness. The 2008 crash took the crisis to the next level: approximately 7.5 million jobs were lost between 2007 and 2009. It also spawned political extremism, as research on financial crises has shown.

Now imagine that same devastation, but permanent. And global. And accelerating every single day.

The End At Our Doorstep

If we continue on this route, we’re headed straight for a technological apocalypse. And I don’t mean robots with guns – we could see a controlled, systematic extermination of the very things that make us human.

We’ve already seen what happens when AI-powered propaganda ignites real-world violence – according to a Modern Diplomacy article, AI has opened the door to manipulation by bad actors seeking to escalate unrest. AI-driven disinformation campaigns have the potential to disrupt democracies, with fake videos and coordinated bot networks now able to spread faster than authorities can respond.

Critical Thinking Is Dying. Humanity Is Going To Die With It.

According to Time Magazine, an MIT study found that using AI for tasks which require critical thinking could harm your cognitive function. You stop questioning. You stop caring. You stop thinking for yourself altogether.

We’re already losing our ability to do the little things. Write an email, summarize an article you could read in 2 minutes, explore an idea independently… you see where I’m going with this?

The more convenient AI makes everything, the less you think for yourself. And remember that the less you think for yourself, the easier you are to control.

You’ve outsourced your decision-making to AI that predicts what you want before you know you want it. Your preferences are shaped by AI recommendation engines, and your opinions are influenced by AI-curated feeds.

You’re making yourself easy bait for any malicious power that has access to AI technology.

There’s Still Time – But Barely

This is the endgame.

You, unable to think your way out, because you gave that ability away one convenience at a time.

This isn’t paranoia. In two weeks, I’ll share proof to back up every claim. I’ll call out the companies who claim to be “protecting humanity” while dismantling it on the side – names, quotes, proof.

Till then, stay alert – don’t sleepwalk into an apocalypse. Sure, use AI, but don’t let it turn you into an NPC. Be aware of what’s happening behind the scenes and question every answer: who wrote it, why, who wins from it? Go to the source, read the evidence, and decide for yourself.

We still have the opportunity to use AI for good. But not if we lose our humanity in the process.

Check back on 10/29. I’ll tell you everything.

– A

Add your email below to receive the next letter.
Or don’t and regret it later.

*By providing your email address, you agree to receive announcements, updates, and promotional content from DearWorld.ai. We may share your information with trusted affiliates and service providers (such as ActiveCampaign) for marketing and operational purposes. You can withdraw your consent at any time by clicking “Unsubscribe” in any email or by contacting privacy@dearworld.ai. For more information, please review our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: This open letter to the World represents the author’s personal views and opinions. Any external links are provided for attribution and informational purposes only, and the author is not responsible for the content, accuracy, or policies of third-party sites. Readers are encouraged to review all materials directly for accuracy and context. Any forward-looking statements are speculative in nature and intended to provoke thought, not to serve as definitive predictions. References to health, psychology, or addiction are drawn from cited research and reporting, and should not be taken as medical advice. The use of the name “Dear World” in this domain is intended solely as part of this campaign’s title and does not imply any affiliation, sponsorship, endorsement, or connection with any other organization, entity, or project named “Dear World,” nor with Anthropic, MIT, Axios, Modern Diplomacy, Time Magazine, or any other entities referenced.

Add your email below to receive the next letter.
Or don’t and regret it later.

Disclaimer: This open letter to the World represents the author’s personal views and opinions. Any external links are provided for attribution and informational purposes only, and the author is not responsible for the content, accuracy, or policies of third-party sites. Readers are encouraged to review all materials directly for accuracy and context. Any forward-looking statements are speculative in nature and intended to provoke thought, not to serve as definitive predictions. References to health, psychology, or addiction are drawn from cited research and reporting, and should not be taken as medical advice. The use of the name “Dear World” in this domain is intended solely as part of this campaign’s title and does not imply any affiliation, sponsorship, endorsement, or connection with any other organization, entity, or project named “Dear World,” nor with The New York Times, Oxford Academic, The Bulletin, Forbes, Axios, Medium, Cleo Abram, Alex Kantrowitz, Bloomberg, Anthropic, CNBC, Investopedia, Time Magazine, or any other entities referenced.